¿Qué es la teoría de los marcos relacionales?
La teoría de los marcos relacionales (TMR) es una aproximación conductual novedosa alestudio del lenguaje, que hace especial énfasis en la investigación de tipo experimental. En elpresente artículo se revisa la evidencia empírica que apoya la validez de esta teoría comoprograma de trabajo para el análisis experimental del lenguaje y la cognición. Dicha evidenciase presenta en relación con dos elementos clave de la teoría: la conceptualización operante delcomportamiento relacional derivado y la estrecha relación existente entre el lenguaje y lasrelaciones estimulares derivadas. Los estudios revisados suponen un claro apoyo empírico alconcepto de conducta verbal propuesto por la TMR, a la vez que demuestran que dichaaproximación teórica constituye un programa de trabajo muy prometedor que, por el momento,ya ha generado resultados positivos en áreas de investigación que tradicionalmente hanresultado problemáticas para el análisis del comportamiento. Dichos estudios también indicanque la TMR puede proporcionar una explicación funcional de algunos de los hallazgostípicamente obtenidos por la investigación cognoscitiva acerca del lenguaje.
Referencias bibliográficas:
Para más información:
Annett, J. M. & Leslie, J. C. (1995). Stimulus equivalence classes involving olfactory stimuli. The Psychological Record, 45, 439-450. Barnes, D., Hegarty, N. & Smeets, P. M. (1997). Relating equivalence relations to equivalence relations: A relational framing model
of complex human functioning. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 14, 57-83.
Barnes,D.,McCullagh,P.D. &Keenan,M.(1990).Equivalenceclassformationinnon-hearingimpairedchildrenandhearingimpaired
children. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 8, 19-30.
Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Smeets, P. M., Cullinan, V. & Leader, G. (2004). Relational Frame Theory and stimulus
equivalence: Conceptual and procedural issues. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 4, 181-214.
Barnes-Holmes, D., Staunton, C., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Whelan, R., Stewart, I., Commins, S., Walsh, D., Smeets, P. M. & Dymond, S. (2004). Interfacing relational frame theory with cognitive neuroscience: Semantic priming, the Implicit Association Test, and event related potentials. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 4, 215-240.
Barnes-Holmes, Y., Barnes-Holmes, D., Roche, B. & Smeets, P. M. (2001a). Exemplar training and a derived transformation of functions in accordance with symmetry. The Psychological Record, 51, 287-308.
Barnes-Holmes, Y., Barnes-Holmes, D. Roche, B. & Smeets, P. M. (2001b). Exemplar training and a derived transformation of functions in accordance with symmetry II. The Psychological Record, 51, 589-603.
Barnes-Holmes, Y., Barnes-Holmes, D. & Smeets, P. M. (2004). Establishing relational responding in accordance with opposite as generalized operant behavior in young children. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 4, 559-586.
Barnes-Holmes, Y., Barnes-Holmes, D., Smeets, P. M., Strand, P. & Friman, P. (2004). Establishing relational responding in accordance with More-than and Less-than as generalized operant behavior in young children. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 4, 531-558.
Bentin, S., McCarthy, G. & Wood, C. C. (1985). Event-related potentials, lexical decision and semantic priming. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 60, 343-358.
Blackledge, J. T. (2003). An introduction to relational frame theory: basics and applications. The Behavior Analyst Today, 3, 421-433.
Bohórquez, C., García, A., Gutiérrez, M. T., Gómez, J. & Pérez, V. (2002). Efecto del entrenamiento en reflexividad y la evaluación de equivalencia en la competencia entre relaciones arbitrarias y no arbitrarias en el paradigma de equivalencia-equivalencia. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 2, 41-56.
Branch, M. N. (1994). Stimulus generalization, stimulus equivalence, and response hierarchies. En S. C. Hayes, L. J. Hayes, M. Sato, & K. Ono (Eds.), Behavior analysis of language and cognition (pp. 51-70). Reno, NV: Context Press.
Bush, K. M. (1993). Stimulus equivalence and cross-modal transfer. The Psychological Record. 567-584.
Carpentier, F., Smeets, P. M. & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2002). Matching functionally same relations: implications for equivalence as
a model for analogical reasoning. The Psychological Record, 52, 351-370.
Carr, D., Wilkinson, M., Blackman, D. & McIlvane, W. J. (2000). Equivalence classes in individuals with minimal verbal repertoires.
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 74, 101-114.
Clayton, M.C. & Hayes, L.J. (1999). Conceptual differences in the analysis of stimulus equivalence. The Psychological Record, 49, 145-161.
Holcomb, P. J. & Neville, H. J. (1991). Natural speech processing: An analysis using event-related brain potentials. Psychobiology, 19, 286-300.
Holcomb, P. J. & Anderson, J. E. (1993). Cross-modal semantic priming: A time-course analysis using event-related potentials. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 379-411.
Horne, P.J. & Lowe, F. (1996). On the origins of naming and other symbolic behavior. Journal of The Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 185-241.
Kamin, L. J. (1968). “Attention-like” processes in classical conditioning. En M. R. Jones (Ed.), Miami Symposium on the Prediction of Behavior: Aversive Stimulation (pp. 9-31). Miami: University of Miami Press.
Kastak, C. R., Schusterman, R. J. & Kastak, D. (2001). Equivalence classification by California sea lions using class-specific reinforcers. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 76, 131-158.
Kounios, S. A. & Holcomb, P . J. (1992). Structure and process in semantic memory: evidence from event-related potentials and reaction times. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 460-480.
Kutas, M. (1993). In the company of other words: Electrophysiological evidence for simple-word and sentence context effects. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8, 533-578.
Kutas, M. & Hillyard, S. A. (1984). Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association. Nature, 307, 1161-1163.
Lattal, K. A. & Perone, M. (Eds.) (1998). Handbook of research methods in human operant behavior. Nueva York: Plenum Press. Leonhard, C. & Hayes, S. C. (1991 Mayo). Prior inconsistent testing affects equivalence responding. Presentación en la Association
for Behavior Analysis Convention. Atlanta. Leslie,J.C.,Tierney,K.J.,Robinson,C.P.,Keenan,M.&Barnes,D.(1993).Differencesbetweenclinicallyanxiousandnon-anxious
subjects in a stimulus equivalence training task involving threat words. The Psychological Record, 43, 153-161.
Lipkens, R. (1992). Analogical reasoning as arbitrarily applicable relational responding. Tesis doctoral no publicada, Universidad
de Nevada, Reno.
Lipkens, R., Hayes, S. C. & Hayes, L. J. (1993). Longitudinal study of the development of derived relations in an infant. Journal
of Experimental Child Psychology, 56, 201-239.
Luciano, M. C. & Gómez, S. (2001). La derivación de funciones psicológicas. Psicothema, 13, 704-721.
Luciano, M. C., Barnes-Holmes, Y. & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2001). Early verbal developmental history and equivalence relations. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 1, 137-149.
Luciano, M. C., Gómez, I. & Rodríguez, M. (2002 Mayo). Monitoring derived relations in an infant from 15 to 24 months. Presentación en la Association for Behavior Analysis Convention. Toronto (Canada).
McIntire, W.J., Cleary, J. & Thompson, T. (1987). Conditional relations by monkeys: Reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 47, 279-285.
Mowrer, O. H. (1940). An experimental analogue of “regression” with incidental observations on “reaction formation”. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 35, 56-87.
Mueller, M. M., Olmi, D. J. & Saunders, K. J. (2000). Recombinative generalization of within-syllable units in pre-reading children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 515-531.
O’Hora, D., Peláez, M. & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2005). Derived relational responding and performance on verbal subtests of the W AIS- III. The Psychological Record, 55, 155-175.
O’Hora, D., Roche, B., Barnes-Holmes, D. & Smeets, P. M. (2001). Response latencies to derived stimulus relations: Testing two predictions of relational frame theory. The Psychological Record, 52, 51-75.
Ortony, A. (1993). Metaphor, language and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pilgrim, C. & Galizio, M. (1990). Relations between baseline contingencies and equivalence probe performances. Journal of the
Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 54, 213-224.
Pilgrim, C. & Galizio, M. (1995). Reversal of baseline relations and stimulus equivalence: I. Adults. Journal of the Experimental
Analysis of Behavior, 63, 225-238.
Pilgrim, C. & Galizio, M. (2001). Stimulus equivalence and units of analysis. En D. Blackman & J.C. Leslie (Eds.), Experimental
and applied analysis of human behavior (pp. 111-126). Reno, NV: Context Press.
Pilgrim, C., Chambers & Galizio, M. (1995). Reversal of baseline relations and stimulus equivalence: II. Children. Journal of the
Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 63, 239-254.
Plaud, J. J. (1995). The formation of stimulus equivalences: fear-relevant vs. fear-irrelevant stimulus classes. The Psychological Record, 45, 207-222.
Rawson, R. A., Leitenberg, H., Mulick, J. A. & Lefebvre, M. F. (1977). Recovery of extinction responding in rats following discontinuation of reinforcement of alternative behavior: A test of two explanations. Animal Learning and Behavior, 5, 415-420.
Rehfeldt, R. A., Dixon, M. R., Hayes, L. J. & Steele, A. (1998). Stimulus equivalence and the blocking effect. The Psychological Record, 48, 647-664.
Roche, B. & Barnes, D. (1996). Arbitrarily applicable relational responding and sexual categorization: A critical test of the derived difference relation. The Psychological Record, 46, 451-475.
Roche, B. & Barnes, D. (1997). A transformation of respondently conditioned stimulus functions in accordance with arbitrarily applicable relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 67, 275-301.
Roche, B., Barnes, D. & Smeets, P. M. (1997). Incongruous stimulus pairing contingencies and conditional discrimination training: Effects on relational responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 68, 143-160.
Roche, B., Barnes-Holmes, D., Smeets, P. M., Barnes-Holmes, Y. & McGeady, S. (2000). Contextual control over the derived transformation of discriminative and sexual arousal functions. The Psychological Record, 50, 267-291.
Roche, B., Linehan, C., Ward, T., Dymond, S. & Rehfeldt, R. (2004). The unfolding of the relational operant: a real-time analysis using electroencephalography and reaction-time measures. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 4, 587-603.
Saunders, R. R., Drake, K. M. & Spradlin, J. E. (1999). Equivalence class establishment, expansion, and modification in preschool children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 71, 195-214.
Schusterman, R. J. & Kastak, D. (1993). A California sea lion (zalophus californianus) is capable of forming equivalence relations. The Psychological Record, 43, 823-839.
Sidman, M. (1971). Reading and auditory-visual equivalences. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 14, 5-13.
Sidman, M., Rauzin, R., Lazar, R., Cunningham, S., Tailby, W. & Carrigan, P. (1982). A search for symmetry in the conditional
discriminations of rhesus monkeys, baboons and children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 23-44. Spradlin, J. E, Cotter, V. W. & Baxley, N. (1973). Establishing a conditional discrimination without direct training: Stimulus classes
and labels. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 77, 556-566.
Spradlin, J. E., Saunders, K. J. & Saunders, R. R. (1992). The stability of equivalence classes. En S. C. Hayes & L. J. Hayes (Eds.),
Understanding verbal relations (pp. 29-42). Reno, NV: Context Press.
Steele, D. L. & Hayes, S. C. (1991). Stimulus equivalence and arbitrary applicable relational responding. Journal of the Experimental
Analysis of Behavior, 56, 519-555.
Stewart, I. & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2004). Relational Frame Theory and analogical reasoning: empirical investigations. International
Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 4, 241-262.
Stewart, I., Barnes-Holmes, D., Roche, B. & Smeets, P. M. (2001). Generating derived relational networks via the abstraction of
common physical properties: A possible model of analogical reasoning. The Psychological Record, 51, 381-408.
Tonneau, F. (2001). Equivalence relations: A critical analysis. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 2, 1-128.
Vosniadou, S. & Ortony, A. (1989). Similarity and analogical reasoning: A synthesis. En S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 1-18). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Weisbrod, M., Kiefer, M., Winkler, S., Maier, S., Hill, R., Roesch-Ely, D. & Spitzer, M. (1999). Electrophysiological correlates of direct versus indirect semantic priming in normal volunteers. Cognitive Brain Research, 8, 289-298.
Whelan, R. (2002). Derived stimulus relations under contextual control produce association and mediated priming. Experimental Analysis of Human Behavior Bulletin, 20, 22-23.
Wilson, K. G. & Hayes, S. C. (1996). Resurgence of derived stimulus relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 66, 267-281.
Wilson, K. G. & Luciano Soriano, M. C. (2002). Terapia de Aceptación y Compromiso (ACT). Un tratamiento conductual orientado a los valores. Madrid: Pirámide.
Wulfert, E. & Hayes, S. C. (1988). The transfer of conditional sequencing through conditional equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 50, 125-144.
Yamamoto, J. & Asano, T. (1995). Stimulus equivalence in a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes). The Psychological Record, 45, 3-21. Ybarra, J. L., Luciano, M. C. & Gómez, S. (2002). Equivalence relations: Competition between pre-experimental and experimental
history. Revista internacional de Psicología Clínica y de la Salud, 2, 137-152.
Comentarios
Publicar un comentario