¿Qué es el rendimiento académico?

La transformación de las funciones en el estímulo

La teoría de los marcos de relaciones es una teoría y tecnología moderna del lenguaje y la cognición que hace gran énfasis en la trasformación de funciones de estímulo de acuerdo con las relaciones múltiples del estímulo. Revisamos la investigación reciente sobre la trasformación de las funciones de estímulo y argumentamos que la trasformación derivada posee importancia clínica, no solo porque da cuenta de la emergencia de nuevas respuestas ante estímulos previamente neutrales en ausencia de condicionamiento directo, sino porque también ayuda a explicar el desarrollo de nuevas estrategias de evitación y su rápida generalización. Posteriormente se delinean posibles restricciones sobre el efecto de la trasformación derivada por formas físicas del estímulo. En conclusión, el análisis básico y aplicado en curso del fenómeno de la trasformación de funciones representa uno de los más importantes desafíos y oportunidades para el análisis moderno de la conducta.

Referencias bibliográficas: 

Dymond, Simon, Roche, Bryan, Rehfeldt, Ruth Anne, Teoría de los marcos relacionales y la trasformación de las funciones del estímulo. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología [en linea] 2005, 37 (agosto-Sin mes) : [Fecha de consulta: 3 de mayo de 2018] Disponible en:<http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=80537205> ISSN 0120-0534 

Para buscar más información:

Auguston, E. M. & Dougher, M. J. (1997). The transfer of avoidance evoking functions through stimulus equivalence classes. Journalof Behavioral Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry,3, 181-191.Barlow, D. H. (2001). Clinical handbook of psychological disorders: A step-by-step treatment manual. Nueva York: Guilford.Barnes, D. (1994). Stimulus equivalence and relational frame theory. The Psychological Record, 44, 91-124.Barnes, D. & Keenan, M. (1993). A transfer of functions through derived arbitrary and non-arbitrary stimulus relations. Journalof the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 59,61-81.Barnes-Holmes, D., Dymond, S., Roche, B. & Grey, I. (1999). Behaviour analysis: A new agenda for language and cognition. ThePsychologist, 12, 500-504.

Dougher, M. J., Augustson, E., Markham, M. R., Greenway, D. E. & Wulfert, E. (1994). The transfer of respondent eliciting andextinction functions through stimulus equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 62,331-352.Dougher, M., Perkins, D. R., Greenway, D., Koons, A. & Chiasson, C. (2002). Contextual control of equivalence-based transformationof functions. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 78, 63-94.Dymond, S. & Barnes, D. (1994). A transfer of self-discrimination response functions through equivalence relations. Journal of theExperimental Analysis of Behavior, 62, 251-267.Dymond, S. & Barnes, D. (1995). A transformation of self-discrimination response functions in accordance with the arbitrarilyapplicable relations of sameness, more-than, and less-than. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 64, 163-184.Erratum, 66, 348.Dymond, S. & Rehfeldt, R. (2000). Understanding complex behavior: The transformation of stimulus functions. The Behavior Analyst,23,239-254.Dymond, S. & Roche, B. (2003). Size Matters: Examining the Nonarbitrary and Relational Properties of Sexual Reinforcers. Paperpresented at the Annual conference of the Association for Behavior Analysis, San Francisco, USA, May, 2003.Forsyth, J. P. & Eifert, G. H. (1996). The language of feeling and the feeling of anxiety: Contributions of the behaviourisms towardunderstanding the function-altering effects of language. The Psychological Record, 46 , 607-649.Friman, P. C., Hayes, S. C. & Wilson, K. G. (1998). Why behavior analysts should study emotion: The example of anxiety. Journalof Applied Behavior Analysis, 31,137-156.Hayes, S. C. (1992). Verbal relations, time, and suicide. En S.C. Hayes & L. J. Hayes (Eds.), Understanding verbal relations (pp.109-120). Reno, NV: Context Press.Hayes, S. C., Kohlenberg, B. S. & Hayes, L. J. (1991). The transfer of specific and general consequential functions through simpleand conditional equivalence relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 119-137.Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D. & Roche, B. (2001).Relational Frame Theory: A Post-Skinnerian Account of Human Languageand Cognition. Nueva York: Plenum Press.Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K. & Wilson, K. G. (1999). Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: An experiential approach to behaviorchange. Nueva York: Guilford Press.Nepalese dog commits ‘suicide.’ (1995, December 1st). The Irish Times.O’Brien, A., Roche, B., Dymond, S. & Forsyth, J. P. (2003). A derived transformation of avoidance response functions in accordancewith a complex relational network.Manuscript submitted for publication.O’Hora, D., Roche, B., Barnes-Holmes, D. & Smeets, P. (2002). Response latencies to multiple derived stimulus relations: Testingtwo predictions of Relational Frame Theory. The Psychological Record, 52, 51-75.O’Hora, D., Barnes-Holmes, D. & Roche, B, & Smeets, P. M. (en prensa). Derived relational networks and control by novel instructions:A possible model of generative verbal responding. The Psychological Record.Rehfeldt, R.A. & Hayes, L. J. (1998). Untrained temporal differentiation and equivalence class formation. The Psychological Record, 48,481-509.Ridoutt, N. (2003) A transformation of respondent eliciting stimulus functions in accordance with the derived arbitrary relations ofsameness and opposition. Unpublished undergraduate thesis, APU, Cambridge.Roche, B. & Barnes, D. (1997). A transformation of respondently conditioned sexual arousal functions in accordance with arbitraryrelations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 67,275-301.Roche, B., Barnes-Holmes, D., Smeets, P. M., Barnes-Holmes, Y. & McGeady, S. (2000). Contextual control over the derivedtransformation of discriminative and sexual arousal functions. The Psychological Record, 50,267-291.Sidman, M. (1994). Equivalence relations and behavior: A research story. Boston, MA: Author’s Cooperative.Smeets, P. M. & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2003). Children’s emergent preferences for soft drinks: Stimulus equivalence and transfer. Journalof Economic Psychology, 24, 603-618.Steele, D. & Hayes, S. C. (1991). Stimulus equivalence and arbitrarily applicable relational responding. Journal of the ExperimentalAnalysis of Behavior, 56,519-555.Wilson, K., Hayes, S. C., Greeg, J. & Zettle, T. (2001). Psychopathology and psychotherapy. En S. C. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes, & B.Roche (Eds.), Relational Frame Theory: A post-Skinnerian account of language and cogntion(pp. 211-237). Nueva York: Plenum.